Slow Environmental Progress
Actually, stop and reverse production in oil and other environmental impacts.
“Erinaceous” on Reddit, a very intelligent person, left a rather grim forecast of sorts.
Here’s part of it, with a link to the whole comment directly. If you can read all of this and NOT want to reverse progress, I don’t know what else to say:
The only low hanging fruit left is degrowth and conservation . Any growth paradigm, even a 100% renewable paradigm leads to overshoot and isn’t remotely possible within our time frame. To stay below 450 ppm/carbon in the atmosphere would require a 130 fold improvement in dollar GDP per gram carbon of emissions. Given that anything that costs a dollar represents roughly 7 MJ of energy there’s basically no way to make those numbers square unless we stop growing the economies and working on poverty reduction, relocalization, ecological agroforestry, rebuilding soil and working less.
That’s kind of the interesting part actually. The way we get out of this mess is by having more time and economies based around art, culture and the humanities ie. the parts of culture that can produce value with very little energy inputs.
What’s the alternative to oil? Local food production based around perennial vegetables and tree crops would require very little energy input and produce as much nutrition per acre as energy intensive agriculture. Plus it would build soil and sequester carbon. This seems like a no brainer. The 500 km salad is gone. I mean it’s gone anyways when oil tops 160-190$/bbl.
Kill the military. The military uses more oil that the entire civilian domestic consumption. Getting rid of that buys us a few years.