Category Archives: life

Idiocracy and Technology

Left as a comment on this post by the esteemed Doug Hill, author of Not So Fast.


The movie Idiocracy showed people in their recliner chairs, reduced to insignificant blobs of meat that lacked basic intelligence. Everything ordered from the Internet, and all of it was major brand name.

Endless media consumption, medicine vending machines, and Monster truck shows.

Is that where we really want to head?

Sad thing is, most people will read these types of articles and write them off as some “crank” had written them. These people will think that some Luddite is spouting nonsense (not knowing what the Luddites were).

So the brands will win with their normalcy-invading brand advertising. The drones will become a thing because endless, unadulterated “Progress ™” is NECESSARY DANG IT!

The Technological Progress “Prove It” Manifesto (Redux)

This is an article I had written back in 2015, lost it during a transition of my blog, and I have used the Wayback Machine to recover it.  It is republished here … “Redux”:

I’m sick and tired of hearing the same tropes, over and over again, about some part of technological progress…

  • “We’re really close to being able to…”
  • “This breakthrough technology could do…”
  • “This technology has the potential to change the world by doing…”

And on, and on…

This whole manifesto is going to be centered around one (tl; dr) idea … quit talking about it, writing articles about it, getting news media about it etc…

Instead, let’s just see your whiz-bang technology prove it.

And don’t take me for a person who doesn’t keep up with exponential thinking, the possibilities of technology, artificial intelligence, desalination technology etc…

I’m not that person.  I geek out, like most geeks do, when I see the possibilities being offered by technology we can create.

So, when you’re saying that nano-technology will destroy viruses, change the world, or better yet, influence energy production … I want you to prove it.  Quit talking about potential, “in the future” stuff … prove it.  Make it available for everyone to use, not just wealthy people.

Because if you can’t do that, if everybody can’t use your whiz-bang technology right now, today, to do all (not just some) of the things you’re getting marketing, money and media attention for…

Then you’re a bullshit artist, and nothing more.

Re-read from the word “Because” above.  Companies, people, etc… are getting benefits from talking about tech, but not showing everybody the benefits of the usable technology they’re promising.

I don’t care about predictions, articles, rhetoric, “investor related news,” etc… until you can show me results.

I want my nanotechnology, my bio-hacking, my artificial intelligence, and my desalination plants to give water to every single person on this planet.  I want to be able to feed every single person, provide cheap and clean (in terms of output) energy to every person, and not forget to take care of the full inventory of costs associated with this production.

As a fellow human being on this planet, I want all of that potential to exist in my life, right now.

Why?

Because you, the person or business entity promoting your whiz-bang technology, are in the media everywhere … telling me what your technology could do, has the potential to do, or that it “will change the world!”.

But until you come to the general market with your technological solution that benefits every single person on this planet … you’ve failed, and miserably.  You can’t eat (or drink) potential, might, could, grok, or even changing the world … until there IS something to consume (again, for everyone, not just the wealthy elite).

Here’s the bottom line (and the reason for this Manifesto)…

We are coming into what will likely be the hardest, most challenging, and resource-depleted decades or centuries our species (Homo-sapiens) has ever experienced.  Climate is changing (partly because of us), the economic conditions are terrible, and people just need a reason … a real reason … to be able to look forward to freedom, relative comfort, and a modest existence.

You, the person or entity responsible for your carnival barking (which includes media that groks on potential tech WAY too soon), your tech is the link between an easier couple of centuries, or a fatalistic couple of centuries.

By promoting, getting excited about, and telling all of us what your whiz-bang technology could do, has the potential to do, etc… you have put yourself in the position and have the responsibility to deliver on all (not just some) of your promises.  Otherwise, you’re just selling a fantasy, and that is completely worthless.

I can get “fantasy” from my science fiction book seller.  What am I going to get from you?

Because you see, we don’t have time (any longer) for empty platitudes and potential. We need technological superheroes to actually deliver the goods, as they say.

Dr. Peter Diamandis (whom I respect greatly) has written in his book titled Abundance (which I recommend) about the need to quit paying attention to negative news.  That the reason we do so, is because of a primal survival instinct from long ago.

Well, Dr. Diamandis, if negative news is what we are paying attention to … you must counter that with overwhelmingly positive news in order to take the attention away from the fear-mongers.

So, part of this manifesto is for you sir, because that positive news cannot be filled with empty promises any longer.  We’ve heard about hover boards and “World Fair” potential long enough.

Now it’s time for you, Dr. Diamandis, and all of your highly skilled “techno-utopians” out there to do one not-so-simple job… prove it.

Three-Dimensional Thinking (Preface)

Over the next few months I will be gently (sporadically and slowly) explicating a concept I call “three-dimensional thinking.”

Here is a very grain-sized 8-million foot overview (not even an overview) of the concept:

1-D thinking = static “Coke or Pepsi” thinking, where someone won’t adjust thinking even when presented with verifiable and reliable evidence.  Note that someone “changing their opinion” versus “adjusting their thinking” is also an idea here.  This type of thinking feels like a rigid event that acts like a “rock” … even in the face of new evidence.

2-D thinking = what people call “critical thinking.”  One idea (of many) here … someone knows and recognizes that they have cognitive biases etc. and will adjust their thinking based on evidence presented. They will adjust their thinking in a “probabilistic” way, and only IF it requires adjusting.  A 2-D thinker acknowledges that thinking and formation of ideas is a constant process, not an event.

3-D thinking = takes 2-D thinking and adds the “depth” dimension.  Here someone is able to take on multiple ideas and explicate the entire interconnected nature of those ideas and their impact on the world (or reality). Someone is also able to adjust thinking on each idea, and the overall “body of ideas” based on evidence, perhaps tested experience, and new modes of “interconnected-ness.”

This might include new ideas that “attach” themselves to the original body (flow) of ideas, or subtract themselves from it (on a constant basis) … AND how that whole body of ideas changes and flows constantly (this is key) etc.

The above is a pixel-sized snapshot of what I will be attempting to explicate.  Keep in mind that I am human, and have not “mastered” this concept in any sense (and always willing to learn).  I don’t think anyone can master thinking, because claiming mastery within a changing flow of information is a static statement.

And that is also a key point, this is an ever-developing, “non-mechanistic,” and very complex topic.  When I begin to outline whom I consider 3-D thinkers from the past, you’ll see what I mean by that.

Anyhow, my overall objective in explication and dissemination this concept of 3-D thinking is I think we all need to work on improving how we think about this uncertain and propaganda-filled world.

I feel that if we don’t, that most of our species will fall prey to the manipulation and control of a rather psychopathic group within Homo-sapiens (NOT some simplistic “elite” or “Illuminati” … but rather a group that constantly changes, and comprises of a complex network of parts, people, groups and places).

While that might sound like some misplaced conspiracy theory … once you remove the media-infused “tin foil hat” imagery from your mind, you’ll begin to discover how the world really works.  (WHICH, by the way, is something I don’t know fully … and I don’t think ANYONE does 100%).

But enough with the “op-ed” part … let’s all improve our thinking together.